Web accessibility statement

RNIB's website has been designed with the needs of people with sight problems in mind, including those who use access technology to browse the internet. We have also taken on board international guidance and best practice on web accessibility. 

We are committed to ensuring everyone can access our website. This includes people with sight problems, hearing, mobility and cognitive impairments as well as users with dial-up, older browsers or newer technologies such as smartphones and tablets. 

If you have any comments and or suggestions please don't hesitate to contact us about the site by emailing webeditor@rnib.org.uk

Conformance statement

RNIB works towards meeting the RNIB Surf Right Guidelines for web accessibility. The checkpoints are taken from Website Accessibility Initiative (WAI) guidelines, published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

The site is tested regularly to ensure that we are working towards the standards. The site also undergoes user testing by blind and partially sighted users.

We test the website using the following browsers:

Windows

  • Internet Explorer 7, 8, 9 and 10
  • Chrome 33
  • Firefox 28
  • Opera 20

Mac

  • Chrome 33
  • Firefox 28
  • Safari 7
  • Opera 20

Mobile

  • Apple iOS - Safari 6 on iOS6 and Safari 7 on iOS7
  • Android - Default web browser and Chrome 33

Surf Right

RNIB's take on web accessibility has been summarised in the Surf Right standard. This is the result of an intensive work of research aimed to address the most important challenges faced by disabled people. 

Most of the guidance and requirements that need to be met to reach the Surf Right standard are based on the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) recommendations. The Surf Right standard is aligned to the WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0).

Main differences with WCAG 2.0

There are some differences in the organisation of guidelines and conformance requirements between Surf Right and WCAG 2.0. Surf Right is similar to WCAG 2.0 Double-A guidance, with the following main differences:

  • Exclusion of WCAG Double-A requirements: Surf Right does not require two of the more technically challenging WCAG 2.0 Double-A requirements where practical alternatives can be provided.
  • Inclusion of WCAG 2.0 Triple-A requirements: Surf Right includes some of the higher level requirements of WCAG 2.0, where our experience shows that they are both valid and important to disabled users.
  • Reliance on client-side script: WCAG 2.0 allows reliance on accessibility supported JavaScript or other client-side script. Surf Right requires that an alternative mechanism is provided for core or important information and functionality.
  • Additional requirements: Surf Right requires the use or avoidance of some techniques where experience has proved that to do so would significantly improve accessibility. Currently these techniques (called Surf Right Best Practice requirements) aren't specifically mentioned in WCAG 2.0 sufficient techniques or failures.

Image ALT text and accessibility

As standard we only use ALT tags where an image conveys essential information for the meaning of the page - for example a diagram about how to do something. Where an image is purely decorative we don't add ALT as this is superfluous information, and extra 'noise' that someone with a screenreader will have to get through before getting to the essential information on a page.
 

Further information

For more details about Surf Right and RNIB's work with web accessibility, contact webeditor@rnib.org.uk.

Report websites with accessibility issues to Fix the Web.

Donate now

Right now we can only reach one in three of the people who need our help most. Please make a donation and help us support more blind and partially sighted people.

Donate now